State and national standards shape our public education, but what we get isn’t always what we wanted, or what is best. No doubt there is a place for state and national standards and I feel like they give us valuable direction in education. Thomas J. Sergiovanni put it this way, “one cannot legislate or mandate superior teaching and learning or other aspects of quality education. These result from the efforts of competent and committed professionals” (Sergiovanni, Kelleher, McCarthy, & Fowler, 2009). I question how much influence legislation and mandates should have upon our classrooms, and upon our teachers. I have seen a few specific lessons created by our state that have been mandated lessons. One in particular is a mandated video they require to be shown in CTE Intro. It is part of a Cyber Careers lesson. The video was probably good when they first introduced the lesson, but it is outdated now, and still rather boring to many seventh graders. I disagree with the idea of having mandated curriculum, and instruction, and am glad things haven’t gone too much farther in that direction. I am satisfied with the standards that have been created for the classes I teach, but some classes have redundant standards. I don’t think that is entirely a bad thing; because students learn by repetition, and some concepts and skills need extra attention over time. It’s the standards that don’t require extra attention that concern me. One state or national standard does affect a lot of people. What do you think about Standards and Objectives?
Reference
Sergiovanni, T. J., Kelleher, P., McCarthy, M. M., & Fowler, F. C.(2009). Issues Shaping School Policy and Administration: Educational Governance and Administration, 50.